Cloudtopcable blog
YUEDAO INDUSTRIAL / Cloudtop cable established in 2009. It is a three-in-one overall solution provider of integrating front-end information collection and transmission, local area network integrated information transmission scheme, computer room terminal data storage, and energy management energy-saving applications.
By YD Export | 03 April 2025 | 0 Comments

Choosing the Right Data Center Cabling Solution: AOC or DAC?


data center  AOC or DAC

As AI and Big Data drive explosive growth in computing demand, data centers require high-performance, low-latency connectivity. Here’s how to select between Active Optical Cables (AOC) and Direct Attach Copper Cables (DAC) for optimal server interconnects.


Key Connectivity Requirements in Modern Data Centers

  1. High-Speed Computing
    • AI training demands GPU/accelerator clusters with 100G+ bandwidth
    • Real-time inference requires <1μs latency between servers
  2. Scalable Bandwidth
    • Big Data workflows need 25G/100G/400G adaptable links
    • Storage networks require lossless RoCE/RDMA support
  3. Space & Power Efficiency
    • TOR (Top-of-Rack) deployments need compact, low-power cabling

DAC: The Cost-Effective Short-Reach Solution

Best For: Server-to-switch links ≤3m
Advantages:

  • Lowest Cost: 60-70% cheaper than AOC (no optical components)
  • Zero Latency: Electrical signal direct transmission
  • Plug-and-Play: No additional power required

Limitations:

  • Max 7m reach (400G DAC)
  • Higher weight (copper) may strain ports

Typical Use Cases:

  • Same-rack server interconnects
  • Leaf-spine connections in hyper-converged infrastructure

AOC: The High-Performance Long-Distance Choice

Best For: 3m-100m high-bandwidth links
Advantages:

  • Longer Reach: Up to 100m (400G AOC)
  • Lighter Weight: 80% less bulk than DAC
  • EMI Immune: Optical transmission avoids interference

Limitations:

  • 20-30% higher cost than DAC
  • Requires minimal bend radius (30mm)

Typical Use Cases:

  • Cross-rack AI/GPU cluster connections
  • High-density spine-leaf architectures
  • Disaster recovery site links

Technical Comparison

Feature

DAC

AOC

Max Distance

3-7m (400G)

30-100m (400G)

Latency

0.1ns/m

5ns/m

Power Draw

0W

1-2W per end

Weight

500g/m (400G)

100g/m (400G)

Cost (400G)

150150300

400400600


Selection Guidelines

  1. Choose DAC When:
    • Connecting servers within same rack
    • Budget is primary constraint
    • Operating in low-EMI environments
  2. Choose AOC When:
    • Spanning multiple racks/cabinets
    • Future-proofing for 800G/1.6T upgrades
    • Deploying in high-RF zones (e.g., near power systems)

Future-Proofing Considerations

  • 800G Ready: AOC supports smooth migration to next-gen speeds
  • Thermal Management: DAC may require airflow optimization in dense racks
  • Smart Cabling: New AOC variants integrate health monitoring sensors

Pro Tip: For hyperscale AI clusters, deploy DAC within racks and AOC for spine connections to balance cost/performance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.Required fields are marked. *
Name
E-mail
Content
Verification code
ver_code